A discovery engine for meaningful knowledge, fueled by cross-disciplinary curiosity. A Brain Pickings project edited by Maria Popova in partnership with Noodle. Twitter: @explorer
Paul Miller leaves the internet for a year, then returns to report. Much of what Miller describes in his former relationship with the internet embodies what psychologists call “the hedonic treadmill.”
Findings from Pew’s annual State of New Media Report. Previous data on the dismal decline of ad-supported media here. Some hope for alternatives here and here.
Internet censorship, explained in this wonderful infographic by Hyperakt for the Iran Media Program at my alma mater, the Annenberg School of Communication at Penn.
The internet is the greatest disintermediating force the world has ever known, and it’s going to have to change the way that charities campaign — at least with respect to the ones who like to use individual stories as a way of raising collective funds. That worked much better when you couldn’t help the individual directly.
It reminds me of the structure of the universe. It’s kind of the same with society — there’s different atoms, people, different individuals that are all there for their own reason, that all do their own thing, but ultimately, when you put them all together, you end up with a system. As anything that emerges, it will depend on what we do with it.
Wonderful short documentary on online communities, where, just like in the physical world, we are all stardust.
Every minute a new impossible thing is uploaded to the internet and that improbable event becomes just one of hundreds of extraordinary events that we’ll see or hear about today. The internet is like a lens which focuses the extraordinary into a beam, and that beam has become our illumination. It compresses the unlikely into a small viewable band of everyday-ness. As long as we are online - which is almost all day many days — we are illuminated by this compressed extraordinariness. It is the new normal.
[…]
The good news may be that it cultivates in us an expanded sense of what is possible for humans, and for human life, and so expand us. The bad news may be that this insatiable appetite for supe-superlatives leads to dissatisfaction with anything ordinary.
how do we run around on the vast field of the internet without being crippled and disfigured by the landmines of hatred that are waiting under every shrub, while still managing to sow the seeds of love, art and awesomeness that blossom ever-greenly?
There is a new profession of trail blazers, those who find delight in the task of establishing useful trails through the enormous mass of the common record.
In a must-read 1945 essay, the then-director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development considers information overload and the rising importance of “curation” and filtering.
T.S. Eliot once said, ‘One of the most momentous things that can happen to a culture is that they acquire a new form of prose.’ … A new form of arguing has been invented in our lifetimes, in the last decade, in fact. It’s large, it’s distributed, it’s low-cost, and it’s compatible with the ideals of democracy. The question for us now is, are we going to let the programmers keep it to themselves? Or are we going to try and take it and press it into service for society at large?
The web is a social invention as much as a technical invention … It’s the whole cat and mouse game between the readers and writers that makes the web work.