Coursekit is now Lore.
What’s the Story?
A discovery engine for meaningful knowledge, fueled by cross-disciplinary curiosity.
A Brain Pickings project edited by Maria Popova in partnership with Noodle.
Twitter: @explorer
media and communication
LATEST

Fashionista first appeared on page 100 of my 1993 book Thing of Beauty: The Tragedy of Supermodel Gia. I created it because as I was writing about the fashion industry—and young model Gia Carangi’s immersion in it—there was no simple way to refer to all the people at a sitting for a magazine photo or print ad. I got tired of listing photographers, fashion editors, art directors, hairstylists, makeup artists, all their assistants, and models as the small army of people who descended on the scene. This was also the group that, according to one top fashion illustrator I interviewed, had collectively become “the famous non-famous people” at Studio 54.

Since I was re-reading a lot of the newspapers and magazines from the period of Gia’s supernova career in the late ’70s and early ’80s, and remembering a lot of coverage of Sandanistas (and a lot of “–ista” jokes among my mag writer friends), I just decided to try it.
The word only appeared four times in the book, and it did not immediately catch on. In fact, the first mention of it, in a May 2, 1993 review in the New York Times Sunday Book Review, was a cranky one: The author, Carol Kramer, a magazine fashion editor herself, dissed my “vivid (if slightly unfair) indictment of what Mr. Fried … who tends toward hyperbole, calls the beauty-industrial complex.”
And then she bitch-slapped me for “fashionista,” saying “he makes up corny labels, too.”
[…]
Twenty years later, the word is everywhere—most recently and annoyingly in a bombardment of T.J. Maxx commercials. It sits happily in its place it the OED, which defines it as “a person employed in the creation or promotion of high fashion, such as a designer, photographer, model, fashion writer, etc. Also: a devotee of the fashion industry; a wearer of high-fashion clothing.”

Writer Stephen Fried, my former mentor, apologizes for inventing the word ‘fashionista’ 20 years ago. Also see how other now-common words got their start. 

Fashionista first appeared on page 100 of my 1993 book Thing of Beauty: The Tragedy of Supermodel Gia. I created it because as I was writing about the fashion industry—and young model Gia Carangi’s immersion in it—there was no simple way to refer to all the people at a sitting for a magazine photo or print ad. I got tired of listing photographers, fashion editors, art directors, hairstylists, makeup artists, all their assistants, and models as the small army of people who descended on the scene. This was also the group that, according to one top fashion illustrator I interviewed, had collectively become “the famous non-famous people” at Studio 54.

Since I was re-reading a lot of the newspapers and magazines from the period of Gia’s supernova career in the late ’70s and early ’80s, and remembering a lot of coverage of Sandanistas (and a lot of “–ista” jokes among my mag writer friends), I just decided to try it.

The word only appeared four times in the book, and it did not immediately catch on. In fact, the first mention of it, in a May 2, 1993 review in the New York Times Sunday Book Review, was a cranky one: The author, Carol Kramer, a magazine fashion editor herself, dissed my “vivid (if slightly unfair) indictment of what Mr. Fried … who tends toward hyperbole, calls the beauty-industrial complex.”

And then she bitch-slapped me for “fashionista,” saying “he makes up corny labels, too.”

[…]

Twenty years later, the word is everywhere—most recently and annoyingly in a bombardment of T.J. Maxx commercials. It sits happily in its place it the OED, which defines it as “a person employed in the creation or promotion of high fashion, such as a designer, photographer, model, fashion writer, etc. Also: a devotee of the fashion industry; a wearer of high-fashion clothing.”

Writer Stephen Fried, my former mentor, apologizes for inventing the word ‘fashionista’ 20 years ago. Also see how other now-common words got their start

If you are really a wit, remember that in conversation its true office consists more in finding it in others, than showing off a great deal of it yourself. He who goes out of your company pleased with himself is sure to be pleased with you.
Nothing is more generally exploded than the folly of talking too much; yet I rarely remember to have seen five people together, where some one among them hath not been predominant in that kind, to the great constraint and disgust of all the rest. But among such as deal in multitudes of words, none are comparable to the sober, deliberate talker, who proceedeth with much thought and caution, maketh his preface, brancheth out into several digressions, findeth a hint that putteth him in mind of another story, which he promises to tell you when this is done, cometh back regularly to his subject, cannot readily call to mind some person’s name, holdeth his head, complaineth of his memory; the whole company all this while in suspense; at last says, it is no matter, and so goes on. And to crown the business, it perhaps proveth at last a story the company has heard fifty times before, or at best some insipid adventure of the relater.
Jonathan Swift admonishes against talking too much in a meditation on the art of conversation

Our strength as a nation depends in large measure on the willingness of every citizen to grow in knowledge and wisdom and to discover and use given talents in a constructive and meaningful way.

A letter from President Ford celebrating libraries and librarians. Complement with more heart-warming letters on the importance of libraries from Dr. Seuss, Isaac Asimov, Neil Armstrong, and others.

Our strength as a nation depends in large measure on the willingness of every citizen to grow in knowledge and wisdom and to discover and use given talents in a constructive and meaningful way.

A letter from President Ford celebrating libraries and librarians. Complement with more heart-warming letters on the importance of libraries from Dr. Seuss, Isaac Asimov, Neil Armstrong, and others.

In disputes upon moral or scientific points, ever let your aim be to come at truth, not to conquer your opponent. So you never shall be at a loss in losing the argument, and gaining a new discovery.

Mad Men’s Jon Hamm visits Sesame Street to explain the art of sculpture, one of the 100 ideas that changed art.

There is a flattening effect: A circulating meme has the same weight of relevancy as a well-crafted essay. Once they are both outside the periphery of our attention span, we have a hard time carrying them with us. I have a hard time coming up with things I’ve read or seen on the Internet that have changed my life, but I can think of at least half a dozen books that have — perhaps because I’ve carried them in my hands.

Writers will no longer be writing for posterity, but will be competing for the nebulous spotlight of digital fame, which in these days comes in the form of viral status and features a cat. Their creativity will conform to fit the medium, which emphasizes speed over patience and quantity over quality. I’m afraid that literature will be like television, if novels are only available in online format: done solely for entertainment and written like it, too — relying heavily on cheap gimmicks to attract readers and ad space to sell art. I’m afraid that the digitization of literature will exasperate a culture that already pushes quick media consumption over lifelong enjoyment.

Christine Truong expounds the death of the story and the rise of literary gimmickry in the digital age. But perhaps the story is no more dead than the book, whose alarmist death toll has been sounded for centuries. “Writers don’t need tricks or gimmicks,” Raymond Carver admonished.

For a reminder that anchors the matter in what really matters, see Kurt Vonnegut’s 8 tips on writing great storiesMalcolm Cowley on the 4 essential stages of composing a story, and Barnaby Conrad’s 6 rules for a great story.


Do you make a point of building up other women, even those you dislike, in discussing them with a man?
This is sound practice. But don’t put it on so think that it sounds like a line.

How attractive are you to the opposite sex? In 1949, Esquire set out to help ladies and bachelors woo each other more effectively with two questionnaires on the do’s and don’ts of courtship.

Do you make a point of building up other women, even those you dislike, in discussing them with a man?

This is sound practice. But don’t put it on so think that it sounds like a line.

How attractive are you to the opposite sex? In 1949, Esquire set out to help ladies and bachelors woo each other more effectively with two questionnaires on the do’s and don’ts of courtship.

Good writing is supposed to evoke sensation in the reader, not the fact that it’s raining, but the feeling of being rained upon.
A jarring look at how quickly the U.S. got fat between 1985 and 2010. To put things in perspective, see this visual tour of how the world eats.

A jarring look at how quickly the U.S. got fat between 1985 and 2010. To put things in perspective, see this visual tour of how the world eats.

Ireland’s Central Bank said this morning that a commemorative coin intended to honour James Joyce, which misquotes Ulysses, was “an artistic representation of the author and text and not intended as a literal representation”.

The bank announced the launch of 10,000 copies of the collector coin yesterday. Featuring a portrait of the Ulysses author and lines from chapter three of the novel “depicted as a continuous stream of consciousness”, it reflects, said governor Patrick Honohan, “Joyce’s standing as one of the leading figures in the modernist movement”.

Unfortunately, the text quoted on the coin differs by one crucial “that” from the text written by Joyce.

What do you do if you misquote Joyce on national currency? You call it “an artistic interpretation,” of course.

The paralyzing human fear of being wrong, played out on a major institutional level.

We lost Kurt Vonnegut on April 11, 2007 – but his timeless shapes of stories endure and never cease to delight.

We lost Kurt Vonnegut on April 11, 2007 – but his timeless shapes of stories endure and never cease to delight.

The [Digital Public Library of America] represents the confluence of two currents that have shaped American civilization: utopianism and pragmatism. The utopian tendency marked the Republic at its birth, for the United States was produced by a revolution, and revolutions release utopian energy—that is, the conviction that the way things are is not the way they have to be. When things fall apart, violently and by collective action, they create the possibility of putting them back together in a new manner, according to higher principles.

[…]

For all its futuristic technology, the DPLA harkens back to the eighteenth century. What could be more utopian than a project to make the cultural heritage of humanity available to all humans? What could be more pragmatic than the designing of a system to link up millions of megabytes and deliver them to readers in the form of easily accessible texts?

Above all, the DPLA expresses an Enlightenment faith in the power of communication. Jefferson and Franklin—the champion of the Library of Congress and the printer turned philosopher-statesman—shared a profound belief that the health of the Republic depended on the free flow of ideas.

Robert Darnton considers the monumental implications of this month’s launch of the Digital Public Library of America, a new “distributed system of electronic content that will make the holdings of public and research libraries, archives, museums, and historical societies available, effortlessly and free of charge, to readers located at every connecting point of the Web.”

How far the library has come.

This heartwarming infographic annual report from The New York Public Library shows that 18 million people visited the library’s 91 branches in 2012 – more people than ever before – turning to NYPL for such diverse needs as books, computer workshops, kids programs, job-search help, free English classes, and more.

NYPL is supported by patron donations – make yours here.